blog-1075

The film “Jurassic World” is storming cinemas, so actively that it is aiming to become a box office record holder. We don’t know to what extent the LEGO version of Walking with Dinosaurs repeats the success of its movie source, but we can easily talk about the quality of the game and its gameplay in our video review.

LEGO Jurassic World

Best comments

Whenever I hear their intro, I sing along)

Well, if we take into account the fact that such games are designed for children… They have one useful property – there is a possibility that children will then want to familiarize themselves with the original. Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Jurassic Park.
This does not detract from the disadvantages of the game. But to be honest, I liked her. And I got through the part with the first film only due to nostalgia.

P.S. And on computers the game also https://blightybingo-casino.co.uk/games/ crashes. Turning off subtitles helps with crashes.
P.P.S. In the QTE from the third part, as you can see from the video, we play for T. Rex? How is the fact of losing to Spinosaurus left there??

I want to say a few words about the new film. I watched it twice, but not because I liked it very much, just after the first viewing I was a little disappointed: the dinosaurs are entirely computer generated, the characters are stupid, the script, although it has a couple of interesting ideas, sometimes slides into absurdity: in general, the first film was much better, both in terms of plot and in terms of special effects. And I was somehow offended after watching the film to realize that with the modern capabilities of the film industry, we are being given a computer fake, while in 1993 we were shown dinosaurs that, without exaggeration, were as if they were alive.

But then, as often happens with me, I started re-watching the original trilogy and in addition watched all the extras. materials for it, which described how films were made. And after watching the trilogy and the special episodes, I realized that I was overly strict with the new film, since there was enough nonsense in the first film, remember the scene where the Tyrannosaurus first appeared, in which the girl Lex took out and turned on the flashlight “WHY”. As for the special effects, yes, the stuffed animals in the original trilogy look very natural, or as Vasya said, less fake, but at the same time they are less agile and expressive. Let’s just say stuffed animals look more natural, but computer dinosaurs look more alive, their muscles and skin move, and they have very expressive facial expressions. In addition, as it became known from additional. materials, with stuffed animals you will never be able to show the dinosaur completely in the frame, or make it move quickly, they are only suitable for static and slow scenes, and in Jurassic World there are practically no such scenes. By the way, in the fourth film there is a scene with a dying diplodocus, which was filmed with the help of a stuffed animal, and this scene very clearly demonstrates how much stuffed animals are inferior to graphics in naturalness and smoothness of movements.

In general, I watched the film for the second time, having already refreshed my memory of the three previous films, and therefore I compared the fourth not with my childhood memories, about how I remember, but about how it really is. Still, watching the first film at 11 years old and the fourth at 23 is not the same thing. As a result, the fourth part is a very worthy continuation of the series, the film is good, but your childhood perception of the first films may slightly spoil the impression of watching the fourth film.

I really love Lego games and complete almost everything 100%, and in my opinion it’s best to judge the game by how they adapted the franchise into Lego interpretation. Yurasik World is certainly not the best game in the series, but the spirit of the franchise is very well conveyed in the Lego game. Well, the Lego sets based on the movie are great 😀

Unfortunately, Lego games are slowly becoming obsolete, and there are fewer and fewer interesting innovations with each part. Let’s hope that the developers will try their best for the next game

I also really love Lego games and do not agree with the statement that they are focused only for children. Like a video sequence – yes. But the graphics have never been the main thing in the game. But with the content, everything is even very mature (with the exception of some games and moments): plots and, most importantly, inimitable humor – this is the main highlight of Lego games.

With stuffed animals you will never be able to show the dinosaur completely in the frame, or make it move quickly

Black Fox, rebel, treacherous robber. This is how everyone remembers him who stands in the way of justice and fairness – a harsh bandit or a greedy rich man. At the same time, it represents an example of courage, heroism and selfless courage for the unfortunate and powerless. Although there was already a hero from Sherwood Forest before him, Zorro is in many ways the prototype of a superhero: the fight against evil, a mask, a mysterious person who wants to remain incognito. Legends of the masked man go back to the sixteenth century and the Spanish colonies in America. According to them, there were a large number of daredevils disguised as Zorro. Everyone could put on a mask and help in trouble. Zorro received great publicity after the release of the story “The Curse of Capistrano” in 1919 and its film adaptation “The Mark of Zorro” in 1920. Subsequently, there were more works based on the book, but the connection with the original was sometimes lost so much that the names and identities of the characters belonged to completely different people, or the action took place in a distant alternative future. For some reason, the authors decided to break what was in the original and build their own. They didn’t do it without a reason. Just as the “Z” sign is created by three swings of a sword, three works will also be symbolically considered, containing the same theme, but performing it differently: an animated series, a feature film and a story with an adaptation.

Late eighteenth century. California is still part of the Spanish Empire. Even under a beautiful blue sky, people live in constant terror of the Spanish army. Every day the people’s fear increased, as did their anger, but they were defenseless against the cruelty and injustice of the soldiers. People thought this reign of terror would never end, they almost lost hope. The old days of peace and happiness seemed like a pipe dream. But everything has changed. A hero was returning from overseas to save people from tyranny and injustice. A man who is brave enough to fight for freedom. His name is Zorro.

On the same ship, a young man, the son of a large and influential landowner Don Alejandro de la Vega, Don Diego de la Vega, was returning from his studies in Spain. Having a reputation as a child for being mischievous, brave and a bully, by the age of eighteen, as all his acquaintances noticed upon his arrival, he had become calm and extremely cowardly, and began to avoid various quarrels. This change in character greatly undermined the plans of the Pulido family, a longtime friend of the Vega family. The only daughter Lolita was supposed to become Diego’s wife in the future in order to improve the condition of her family. Previously, before the arrival of young Vega, Lolita might not have been against this, but his sudden change in character made her angry. She couldn’t understand what happened to him and why he became so weak. After all, the old Diego could attack three hooligans at once, but the current one is not even able to raise a sword.

These are two different people

For the viewer, as now for the reader, by this point it may become obvious who the masked hero is. The creators of the series did not keep the secret of Zorro’s identity, because even in the opening the transformation into the people’s avenger is shown.

In general, the entire series is structured according to the scheme “one day an event begins (a crime is committed, some rumor spreads, a person arrives, etc.), and Diego, like Zorro, takes part in it.”. At the crucial moment, Zorro appears seemingly out of nowhere, heroic music begins to play, the hero delivers his speech of justice, fights a crowd of opponents and defeats the villains. He does not achieve his victories alone, as Little Zorro and Diego’s friend Bernardo, an orphan sheltered by the Vega family, often help him in his exploits. Quite often, the freedom fighter is supported by ordinary people who, it will be said without exaggeration, admire the hero. Especially Lolita, who sees in Zorro the ideal man, like many women in the series. Zorro, in turn, shows certain signs of attention exclusively to Lolita.

She is one of the most beautiful girls in the city (if not the most), therefore, not only Señor Zorro is a suitor. Spanish Army Lieutenant Gabriel is the most eligible bachelor. Handsome, strong and fearless fighter, has a high position in the army. But at the same time he is an insidious, arrogant and simply evil person. In most cases, his “company” is Sergeant Gonzales, who is not so insidious, arrogant and evil. On the contrary, it seems that he ended up in the army completely by accident: Gonzales is a gentle person, he can even be sentimental. Like a soldier, he follows the orders of his superiors, although he himself is aware of the cruelty of the command. Because of the gentleness and understanding of the atrocities that the army inflicts on the people, with due effort, the sergeant is sent to counteract the authorities. It is led by Commander Raymond. Cunning, evil, cold and calculating tactician. The commander has his own plans for the future of California, which the governor unknowingly interferes with. The situation is literally characterized by the phrase “The Tsar is good, the boyars are bad,” where the ruler really does not know the situation of the people, which the head of the army takes advantage of.

The series is completely adventure. There are only a few episodes that are important to the main plot, and the rest show secondary stories, most of which are actually interesting. But some of them suddenly introduce strange magic, unprecedented technology and a giant monster like Godzilla. These episodes were made, apparently, for the sake of adding unusual situations and diluting the usual episodes, but against their background they look too strange. The series as a whole is intended for children: it will sometimes be difficult for an adult to follow the non-adult actions of the characters, their manifestation of a caricatured and stereotyped nature. But he can definitely be mature at some points and bring up interesting topics. The most important message running through the entire series is: “What matters in a good deed is not the glory and praise that will follow, but the good deed itself.”. Zorro doesn’t need fame. His goal is to free both his loved ones and other people from tyranny. The hero wears a mask not only because of his identification with crime thanks to the army, but also because Diego simply does not need fame and recognition. The work turned out to be self-sufficient, with its own style and charm. But is there anything left in it from the original story, or has the series completely abstracted itself and come up with something of its own??

In 1821, three hundred years of Spanish rule in Mexico was coming to an end. A popular uprising led by General Santa Anna spread from the arid mountains to the rich and fertile northern province known as California. Peasants gathered in the streets calling for the blood of the last Spanish governor, Don Rafael Montero. Despite orders to return to Spain, Montero refused to leave his post until he got even with his sworn enemy.

This archenemy is Zorro. And although the https://casinobetway.uk/login/ developed plan could not be successfully implemented, Montero still found out who the Black Fox really was. He is the adult Don Diego de la Vega, who was about to give up the Zorro case. As a result of the fight, Diego Esperanza’s wife dies, he himself is sent to prison, and his baby Elena is taken under the care of Montero, mostly as revenge. Twenty years pass. Montero returns to rule California, and Diego Vega is old and in prison. It seemed that the Zorro cause was dead. But on that ill-fated day, the Black Fox, without knowing it, “planted the seed” of the future fighter for justice. After Montero’s plan was thwarted, Zorro gave his medallion to the Murrieta brothers, Joaquin and Alejandro, as thanks for their help. Later they became robbers and, together with their partner Three-Fingered Jack, traveled across the country. One day the gang’s luck runs out and they are surrounded by rangers. Only Alejandro gets out of this scrape: Three-Fingered Jack is wounded, and Joaquin is not given alive into the hands of law enforcement officers and shoots himself. Ranger Squad Captain Love cuts off the head of the dead Joaquin as proof of Murrieta’s death. All Alejandro has left is a desire for revenge and Zorro’s medallion.

Murrieta Gang: Joaquin, Jack, Alejandro

The Black Fox cause is dead, but Diego de la Vega’s fighting spirit remains unbroken. After escaping from prison, he meets Alejandro in a bar. Noticing his ardent disposition, the desire to get even with Captain Love, Montero’s ally, and his medallion, Diego decides to make Alejandro his successor. The theme of “The Mask of Zorro” is the formation of a hero under the guidance of a teacher. At the beginning of the story, Alejandro appears as an ordinary robber, with bad manners, uncut hair, and dirty clothes. Diego prepares Alejandro for the life of Zorro. Gives him fencing lessons, teaches him to behave like a nobleman, explains the main principle of the Black Fox: “Zorro helps people and does not seek glory.”. At first, there were slight disagreements between student and teacher due to the former’s ardor, but in the end Alejandro became worthy of Zorro, although not like Zorro Diego.

Alejandro is more daring, even his clothes reflect the spirit of the bandit. His very behavior shows the fiery character. Diego is a little more restrained, but sometimes gives vent to his emotions. In addition, as was said, Alejandro became Zorro primarily for the sake of revenge on Captain Love. Only later, thanks to Diego’s instructions, did he continue to fight for the people. The film showed the development of a fighter for justice from an ordinary robber. In addition, there is an intersection with those very legends: Zorro can be anyone, it’s not just one person. How far has the story moved from the original work, The Curse of Capistrano??

Oppression by its nature gives birth to a force that will overthrow it. A champion of the oppressed is born. He always appears. About a hundred years ago, California, along with its warmth and romance, peaceful beauty, was struck by a terrible disease – oppression. And then, as if from nowhere, a masked horseman appeared, galloping along the roads, punishing and protecting and eluding the cruel oppressor.

Getting to the point: of the two works narrated, the closest to the story is Kaiketsu Zorro. Almost all the characters are taken from the original: Diego (in the story he is twenty-four years old, and his gentle character is not so caricatured), his father Alejandro (in the story he is a rather strict person), the Pulido family (mostly unchanged), Sergeant Gonzales and the Governor (in the story they are evil people and hungry for money). Lieutenant Gabriel’s character and actions were taken from Captain Ramon. Commander Raymond is not in the story. The biggest change was Bernard, who was a deaf and mute servant, although he also helped Zorro in his affairs. The Mask of Zorro may seem like something of a sequel because of old Diego. But that’s not true at all. There is both a big reason for this, which is a spoiler for the story, and small ones: his beloved is not Lolita Pulido, there are no mentions of other characters from the book. Zorro’s behavior style has been changed. In all the works reviewed, the Black Fox very often fights alone against many opponents, only occasionally becoming a “shadow in the night”. The story shows a strong Zorro, but not omnipotent. He uses his advantages: stealth, sudden appearance, fencing skill. The very first appearance of Zorro in the story demonstrates this perfectly.

Night. Fierce Storm. In the tavern, soldiers led by Sergeant Gonzales are resting by the fireplace. He tells them and his best friend Don Diego de la Vega how he wants to deal with this Curse of Capistrano, how he will meet and easily end it. But no matter where the sergeant was patrolling, news came that the Black Fox was robbing a completely different place. Gonzales thinks Zorro doesn’t have the courage to stand up to him. Don Diego leaves to settle accounts with the secretary, buys wine for everyone with his own money and promises to return later.

The sergeant behind Diego’s back praises him in every possible way in front of the soldiers, and even his shortcomings do not in the least prevent Gonzales from recognizing him as his friend. “He cannot bear thoughts of violence or bloodshed, he is gentle as a spring breeze, but he has a steady hand and a true, penetrating gaze. This is just his way of looking at life,” Gonzales concludes, draining a mug of wine. A man enters a tavern and a native closes the door behind him. A stranger stands with his back to the people in the tavern, shaking off raindrops from his cloak. The owner of the establishment hurried to help the newcomer, but was immediately taken aback when the man turned around. The mask, completely hiding facial features, attracted the attention of everyone in the tavern. The stranger introduced himself: “Senor Zorro is at your service.”!“The robber had a business with Gonzales, because four days ago he beat up a native he didn’t like. The sergeant was about to start a fight, but retreated as soon as he saw Zorro’s gun. The Black Fox does not use this formidable weapon on him, but to control the soldiers who were driven into the far corner. The duel has begun.

In this position, Zorro continued to fence perfectly and did not take his eyes off the corner. At first, the Fox, who made no attempt to attack, infuriated Gonzales with his long defense. The sergeant, realizing that he was succumbing to anger, became deathly cold and continued to fence as he had never fenced in his entire life. But he did not surpass the skill of the robber. Gonzales presses himself against the wall, and Zorro’s pressure intensifies so much that the sergeant is ready to throw away his pride and call the soldiers for help.

His prayers were heard because there was a knock on the tavern door. This prevented Zorro from finishing his punishment, and he retreated through the window. They went in pursuit of him, but at night and in a storm it was impossible to catch him. Upon returning to the tavern, Gonzales began to come up with excuses for his defeat, such as the broken handle of his sword a few days ago and the fact that Zorro had a pistol and could kill him at any moment: “If your attack does not please me, I will shoot, and then I will pierce you right through and thus put an end to the famous sergeant.”. None of the soldiers argued.

Having finished his business, Diego Vega returns to the tavern. Hearing that Zorro had recently been here, young Vega began to question Gonzales, asking leading questions: “Where is the corpse of the robber?”? You said that you would tell how you played with him, how you laughed at him while you fought, how you forced him to retreat and how you pierced him.". Humiliated even more, Gonzales hurried away from the scene of the incident to fulfill his duty and report what had happened to his superiors.

This passage characterizes almost the entire story. Zorro does not scatter dozens of opponents, he uses cunning, surprise, noiselessness and his skill with a sword. Every villain in the book, when defeated, begins to make excuses in every possible way, to lie so as not to be a laughing stock, but for the reader he becomes one. In addition, until the end of the story it is not directly stated who Zorro really is, they are only very strongly hinted at. The ending itself, unlike the rest of the work, feels too dreamlike, which disappointed me a little.

Stills from the film The Mark of Zorro

The 1920 film adaptation, while maintaining the main plot, changed the concept and made Zorro an action film, where the main character jumps, does tricks, and wears the usual mask with his mouth open. The story adheres to the original until the middle, then there is compression and at the end – a reworking of the ending, which slightly reduces the fabulousness, but in meaning does not depart from the original.

A full hundred years have passed since Zorro was first recreated in book and film. Over the years, dozens of works have been created, each of which differs from the original in some aspects. I see several reasons for the differences.

Firstly

Culture, by which I mean country, nationality and the like. Kaiketsu Zorro is a Japanese-Italian work, but mostly still “Japanese”, which is clearly reflected in the visuals and plot structure. So, for example, in eighteenth-century America, according to Kaiketsu Zorro, there are no slaves or Indians at all, there are only hired workers who work for their wages. It is easy to answer why they are not in the work – the Japanese are simply not interested in understanding this. They are interested in making Zorro look cool, Diego looking ridiculous and funny, and so that the mini-story told is exciting for the viewer. The rest serves as decoration, within (and beyond) which you can come up with a story. The Mask of Zorro is an American work; accordingly, the authors approach the history of their country with great trepidation, adding historical figures to the plot, such as General Santa Anna and Joaquin Murrieta. At the same time, they make the main plot direct and simple, but exciting with their battle scenes and stunts. The same applies to The Mark of Zorro.

Secondly

Perception of the original. The authors of adaptations have their own vision of the work, just like many people see something differently. This is the same as the retelling of a story will be different for people: one moment seemed unnecessary to someone and he forgot it, while another found it extremely important. The authors of the works reviewed, for example, decided that it was not necessary to leave the secret of Zorro’s identity to the viewer, which runs counter to the idea of ​​the original.

Thirdly

The desire to make your own. Not necessarily something like “I know better than the original source how to do it right,” although this is possible. Naturally, some people treat the original source with respect and try to adhere to the framework, while others do not. Nevertheless, every author, when adapting, wants to leave a piece of himself in his work. The original source is used rather as a basis for their own creation.

There are no perfect adaptations that convey absolutely everything that the original conveyed. But there are those who can convey the spirit of the original, its main meaning and message, and also add their own ideas that do not contradict the original. The degree of distortion of the original in such adaptations is usually small, as is their number. Are Kaiketsu Zorro, The Mask of Zorro and The Mark of Zorro good adaptations?? If you look at it roughly, the 1920 film adaptation came close to this, and the rest simply distorted the original idea. If you look at them with a view independent of the original, you can find them interesting and charming works.

. I have the same opinion about any media franchise. The series of games about Lara Croft is no exception. In light of the release of “Rise of the tomb raider”, I decided to take a little dip into the past. Repetition is the mother of learning, isn’t it??

The 2006 game – Tomb raider: legend – was chosen as a reference point. . . The game was favored by critics and well received by fans, which puts you in a positive mood. Unfortunately, all that glitters is not gold. I’ll try to sort it all out.

Gameplay — A fundamental part of any game. Crystal Dynamics did not reinvent the wheel and used the foundations laid in the very first game in the series as the foundation. Let me remind you that it came out in 96… The gameplay can be roughly divided into 3 components: platformer, action and world exploration. Sounds good right? But there were some nuances..

Firstly, platformer. By 2006, the “Prince of Persia” trilogy had appeared in this field, and if the prince developed the ideas of the genre, then Lara is more like a copy of it. Painfully familiar situations, similar animation and some rough edges that were not corrected. For example, on the screen Lady Croft moves with cat-like grace, but in reality it feels like you are controlling a clumsy elephant, looking for an opportunity to fly into the abyss. The camera also adds another layer of ointment to the barrel, as if living its own life, now showing off the sirloin parts of our traveler’s body, now huddling in a corner, making some jumps quite difficult. Despite these shortcomings, everything looks quite spectacular and does not get boring. Mechanics still work.

Second action is an important component. Everything is much worse here. The fact is that Lara can carry two weapons at the same time. Dual pistols with infinite ammo at all times and one additional weapon that drops from killed enemies. Shotgun, rifle or grenade launcher. The shotgun is powerful at close range and completely useless at long range. In contrast, the rifle is not only longer-range and faster-firing, but also performs quite well at short distances, which leaves the shotgun out of use. The grenade launcher does not manifest itself in any way, because “Tomb Raider” can already throw grenades at enemies, and its ammunition is quite rare. It turns out that you will potentially run the entire game with a pair of Pistols/Rifles. Not too much. In addition to this, the game is dominated by a strange auto-aim system, where you don’t even need to aim, just aim towards the enemy and press the shoot button, the game will do the rest. She is the one who decides whether you hit or miss. There is also a manual aiming mode, but you don’t have to use it, because in it the heroine turns into a target, freezing in one place, and, as I already said, it’s the game that decides whether you hit it or not. Nothing depends on your personal level. Accordingly, the concept of “Headshot” does not exist here. There is also no cover system, which negates any maneuvers, and the only tactic that is quoted here is rushing. Fortunately, all 2 types of enemies(. ) are deprived of even the rudiments of intelligence. Armed mercenaries are diligently shooting at the air in front of them, and representatives of the animal fauna are simply running around the room trying to bite you by the heel. There are also bosses in the game, but they are taken by banal starvation and are unremarkable. Alas and ah. Taken together, as you understand, this creates a rather sad picture, because even on maximum difficulty it’s too easy to play.

Third the pillar on which the foundation of gameplay rests is research. There are artifacts scattered throughout the levels. Bronze, silver and gold. The higher the value, the harder they are to find. They may be hidden in drawers, in dark corners, under your bed… Just kidding, but check just in case. In turn, they unlock various bonuses. Artwork, character biographies and additional costumes, of which there are a lot. And now, for such a variety, they would ask for 20 bucks… But do you need it?? The local “mysteries” can also be included in the research. . Yes, we will press plates and pull levers. Moreover, everything is quite obvious and difficulties should not arise.

A couple of additional elements https://casinobella.uk/bonus/ stand out in the gameplay. This is the QTE system and motorcycle rides that began to gain popularity back then. The essence of Quick Time Events is to press a specified key in certain cut scenes. Press left and Lara will dodge the trap, press up and she will jump over the dangerous area… In my opinion, the disadvantage here is excessive slowness, so it’s quite difficult to make a mistake. . Even then, Crystal Dynamics liked to mock the ward  Motorcycle rides look like it would be better if they didn’t exist at all. Well, really, don’t sew a tail on a mare. All you need to do is just move forward, lazily shooting enemies passing by. Controlling a two-wheeled horse is more like rolling butter on a frying pan. Or on the radio. In attempts to curb the iron monster, you will experience deja vu, because the tracks are a small looped section. And now you pass the same boulder again. And again. And again. Mysticism, and only.

If you try to be objective, the gameplay looks quite controversial. On the one hand, we got some pretty lively acrobatics and the lion’s share of fan service. On the other hand, the action, which evokes boredom, dubious stages on a motorcycle, and acrobatic moments are not without drawbacks, and are an exploitation of other people’s achievements. .

Gameplay — 3.5/5

Being a restart of the series, the game does not care plot previous parts and starts the barrel organ in a new one. Meet Lara Croft, a carefree adventurer, an archaeologist and, judging by the gameplay, also a killing machine. We are shown how, while still a child, she and her mother suffer a plane crash somewhere in the middle of the Himalayas. Finding refuge in an ancient temple, they find a strange artifact and accidentally activate it. And as you know, jokes with unknown artifacts are bad and as confirmation of this, Lara’s mother disappears. Actually, the plot is as simple as two pennies: The matured Lady Croft is looking for an artifact similar to the one she saw as a child in order to investigate the disappearance of her mother. . Several scenario aspects contribute to this..

Firstly, poor character development and useless dialogues. In addition to the main character, Lara has two companions, Zip and Alistair. Throughout the game, these are the ones we will hear most often. Zip is a super hacker who only makes jokes. Alistair is a standard smart guy who knows everything, but is terribly cowardly. The stereotypes are off the charts. Level by level we will listen to similar dialogues. Alistair gives a “smart” idea, Zip laughs it off stupidly. . Then what are they for?? I haven’t seen so much “water” for a long time. The development of minor characters is no different. Antagonists with the motivation “I do evil because I am evil” cause confusion. .

Second this moment… At the beginning of the text, I wrote about the spiral of life, that sooner or later everything repeats itself. So, here it is taken to the point of absurdity. Dialogues are repeated, events are repeated. For example, conversation:

At least repeats on three different levels. Different words, but doesn’t change the essence. !"And our archaeologist in a skirt asks Zip and Alistair to pack her things, she goes there". We see this several times. Looks like a cheap attempt to justify a change of location. Lara might as well be shouting “Yaba-daba-doo” at the end of each level!”, it would make just as much sense.

I don’t really want to talk about the plot. The main problem is that it doesn’t captivate you at all. I bet the day after passing you won’t even remember it. But thank you for having it, yes.

. Artists’ work is top notch. Waterfalls, snow-capped mountains, ancient temples. It all looks great. . Technically, the game was not a breakthrough, but the design of Lara’s model was excellent. . The level in Kazakhstan doesn’t work with it either. And if the game crashes, that’s the problem too.

Visualization – 4/5

You can safely shout “Accused!”. The game is simple, the plot is stupid, the action game is completely unsuccessful. I didn’t like Lara’s voice acting (original) either. Duration can also be considered a controversial factor; it can be run in about six hours if you don’t look for secrets. “Tomb raider: legend” is a compilation of successful old ideas and unsuccessful new ones. .

Subjectivation – 3/5

Pros: Spectacular acrobatics, lots of fan service, beautiful visuals
Cons.

The creators of Call Of Duty worked on today’s subject of our review. Knowing that each team has a special and unique style, one could expect either another step on the old rake, or innovation. As a result, both theories were confirmed.

Ocean’s One Girlfriend

The premise is far from trivial: Charles Deckard, a professional art thief, comes to an exhibition at the Museum of New York through the “service entrance”. In one of the rooms, the famous Pandora’s Box is preparing to appear before people, but Deckard is more interested in gold and diamonds, which, logically, should be inside the exhibit. Having used a special key, the unlucky criminal receives a through wound to the hand and, in addition, a catastrophe – lightning strikes from the Box, the earth cracks, and creatures of titanic proportions begin to walk the streets.

Actually, here control passes to the https://casinoallbritish.co.uk/withdrawal/ user, showing what “from the creators of Call Of Duty” is. Like his colleagues from games about the Second World War, Deckard does not really know how to unlock doors with his hands, so he waits for the mercy of His Majesty the script – he throws especially heavy cars aside, destroys boxes blocking the way and gives birth to aggressive monsters out of nowhere. So we are assigned, rather, the role of a spectator: shoot when told, use your brains on command and don’t slow down, because, secretly, the respawn is endless.

Typical for the series Call Of Duty "wooden" gameplay brightens up the epicness of what is happening (although sometimes it lacks polish). Just a couple of minutes after the start, we are already watching New York beating in agony, filled with griffins and colossi assembled from metal. Every now and then we turn the valves to cut off the gas supply, we rush through the street filled with cars, we dodge subway cars… But we remember the inviolability of the script – sometimes we really lack the opportunity to somehow interrupt the series of murders of all the security guards and police officers we meet. Said a few words, opened the door – eaten, bring in the next one. It’s about the old rake.

Second noticeable drawback Legendary – too much contrast levels. No, upon entering the next door, we will not suddenly find ourselves in Antarctica, but after a brisk run through the destroyed building, we really want to continue the banquet. But instead they give us a gray dark warehouse full of containers with blurry textures and constantly respawning monsters. Only the music does not change – leisurely rock with a clear attraction to percussion instruments.

By the way, about monsters and methods of exterminating them. Like any self-respecting action movie, Legendary has a distinctive feature: at the very beginning of his adventures, Deckard acquires a mark on his hand that allows him to absorb clouds of energy scattered throughout the levels. They replace both first aid kits and weapons. The enemies bit me painfully? Hold the "F" key and the hero will restore health. Surrounded? Quickly press the same key twice – the besiegers will scatter to the sides.

But shooting here is boring. Weapons – pistols and machine guns – do not like to make loud sounds and gush with special effects, clicking discreetly with each trigger pull. At the same time, even at the easy difficulty level, a whole clip is spent on one monster, which is why the battles seem frankly drawn out.

Although, even in this case, there is a funny “trick” that allows you to deal with adversaries easily and simply: every resident of Pandora’s Box has a dislike for things that are quite everyday for people, and what. For example, after shooting a fire hose, you can safely hide your firearm assistants in a warm holster, because after a few seconds the soaked opponents themselves will turn into dust.

Generally Legendary – decent shooter. This is not a blockbuster with three "A", but a completely viable project, slightly spoiled by boring levels, lack of physics and a very modest development of Call Of Duty ideas.

Pros: epic scenes; good atmosphere.
Cons: insufficiently developed graphics; boring puzzles.

There is still a whole month left before the release of the third part of Nolan’s Dark Knight saga. To somehow pass the wait, the Traveler’s Tales studio has released its version of the adventures of the long-eared superhero. Very peculiar.

LEGO Batman 2: DC Super Heroes

Best comments

funny, it’s really worth taking a break and playing. but personally, I’d rather go through Batman Arkham Asylum (Arkham City) again, because after Nolan’s films I want cruelty and blood. the review (as always) is excellent (and the Soviet designer, with all his NUTS, was also cool). LEGO fans, children, and adults (with the soul of a child) will love the game

When the conversation started about the https://bingostorm-casino.co.uk/login/ fly in the ointment, I began to fear that they would give “Commendable”. But no. Good thing I was wrong)
Thanks for the review.

The game was a very pleasant surprise, and even more so. Initially, it seemed that replacing funny gestures and grunts with full-fledged voice acting was an extremely dubious idea. In fact, it turned out that the game has acquired a new face, new opportunities for great jokes. And the aforementioned antics and muteness of the heroes once again would not seem so funny. The plot in the game is simply excellent, I completed it in two evenings almost without stopping, because.To. There are enough interesting and unexpected twists, and there aren’t many story quests and it’s only 20-25% of the total content. The city is really interesting to study, to look for characters to solve this or that riddle. We were also very pleased with the selection of voice actors (the Joker and Batman here are not much inferior to Hamill and Conroy, and the rest of the characters are excellent) and the music. What is Superman’s main theme worth when you’re flying over Gotham?. Among the minuses, I would like to note the extremely inconvenient flight control in the city (in locations it is different, more convenient, but there are also not enough stars in the sky) – to land on the selected roof, sometimes it took me even 5 attempts (played on a gamepad).
I played alone, but for sure, as before, in co-op, the already excellent game will sparkle with new colors..

By the way, when the presenter talks about the walled area, this is an allusion to Arkham City, as I understand it?)

Eh… Salary, salary… Why are you ending at such a bad time?? For once I wanted to play with Lego. 🙂

The game is a game, but I have an obsessive desire to get my old construction set out of the attic. And I don’t care what is written on it from 3 to 7 years old – it’s Lego!

The only thing I didn’t like (judging by the video in the background) is that not everything consists of LEGO blocks… LEGO blocks glued to the normal texture of the house look a little strange.

Heroes of Might and Magic, King’s Bounty, Disciples – many in the post-Soviet space, hearing these words, fall into a sacred trance. Developers from Belarusian Aterdux Entertainment fell under this magic back in 2004, when they made a strategy similar in genre "Times of Strife". 11 years later they released an ideological sequel – Legends of Eisenwald. True, there are no gnomes, elves or demons here – the main demons are human passions and vices..

In addition to ordinary “units” and mercenaries, so-called followers can also travel with you – they join even if you have reached the limit in the squad.

Mystical realism

Yes, "Legends of Eisenwald" – this is the so-called low fantasy, a fairly plausible medieval world, reminiscent of a mixture of the tales of King Arthur and “A Song of Ice and Fire”. There are glorious (and not so nice) knights on horses in golden armor, there are some damned mills, witches, sorcerers and treacherous dead maidens dragging knights-errant to the bottom of the lake, but the main driving forces in this world are political intrigue, war, struggle for power, lust (sometimes incestuous) and personal gain.

The main character or heroine (at the start you choose between, conditionally, a warrior, an archer and a mystic magician) spends the entire story campaign trying to avenge his murdered family and return the taken lands and at the same time constantly gets involved in internecine conflicts, territorial wars and dirty political games.

Who to support – a knightly order mired in debauchery, or clergymen ready to commit murder and forgery in order to get their favorite lands? Or maybe the newly minted bourgeois and moneylenders, calmly getting rid of those they no longer need? It’s not possible to stand on the sidelines. All the way we do unpleasant things: we kill debtors, send the girl’s entire family to the next world so that she can live with her beloved, we make a deal with a man who is ready to kill his mother, we collaborate with scoundrels in order not to lose a knighthood, and so on.

Choice in "Legends of Eisenwald" there is almost always – the plot here is non-linear, our decisions affect the available quests, the ending, and even what they will talk about in taverns over a glass of beer. There is also the opportunity to play a noble person, ready, for example, to pay a ransom for someone, and not just spit on him. And yet, most often it is a choice between big and small evils.

Old cocktail

In such a non-standard setting, https://casinobetmgm.co.uk/withdrawal/ a standard one unfolds King’s Bounty with elements Disciples 2 – although not without some individual characteristics. We explore the map in a step-by-step mode, complete quests, hire available troops in various buildings (for example, in villages and monasteries), fight and capture castles to receive income from the adjacent settlements, mines and mines.

We fight again in a step-by-step mode, which is a combination of ideas King’s Bounty And Disciples 2. The fighters are clearly placed in positions (“tanks” in front, arrows behind them, then magicians and sorceresses) practically opposite each other, so there is no long movement to take a more advantageous position. If we go, it’s definitely to hit. Or retreat. “Tanks” are engaged in close combat with each other, and, as a rule, they do not allow you to approach an archer or magician, even if the path to him is open.

Not everyone thinks this combat system is logical – some players at the beta test stage asked the authors to fix it. But they did not agree – they say, otherwise the development, which already lasted five years, would have been delayed even longer. One way or another, there are tactics in such battles, albeit quite specific ones. What also gives it a special flavor is the ability to knock an enemy knight off his horse, authentic medieval weapons with various bonuses and penalties, as well as a small number of attack spells from magicians – they mainly provide friendly and moral support.

For victories we receive experience points and transform them into new levels. Moreover, for all “units” – and here again we need to remember about Disciples 2 — there are alternative branches of development, or even three or four. Who will the shy herbalist eventually become – a dark witch or a light sorceress?? Who will the young nobleman turn into – a knight, a paladin or a blade master?? The choice is yours.

The authors are now working on fixing the bug with experience, so after some time and at a normal difficulty level, life will not seem like paradise.

Variable difficulty

You need to capture castles, but you don’t need to develop them: this is an adventure game, not a strategy with a lot of resources. There is only one resource here: gold and silver. And even if you don’t have any income from the lands (enemies have captured your buildings), nothing bad will happen: just mercenaries demanding a regular salary will refuse to fight until the debt is paid off – and, as a rule, there are enough ordinary, disinterested “units”.

In principle, it is not even necessary to defend castles personally and leave guards there. After capturing a fortress, outpost or watchtower, the garrison appears automatically after some time (or even immediately) and fights itself and gradually “pumps up”.

However, this does not mean that you are at a resort. Resort in "Legends of Eisenwald" only on easy and normal difficulty levels (which, by the way, is not good). Because of a bug with experience gain, your troops very quickly “pump up” and with one left hand, in auto-battle, defeat the most powerful enemies, even those whom, according to the author’s idea, you could not kill for the time being.

But on difficult and very difficult the real game begins, which constantly keeps you on your toes. Opponents attack your possessions much more actively, fight better, develop faster, and after some time, if you play incorrectly, you yourself may encounter some invincible flying squad led by the knight Ivanhoe Godlaikov.

The game has a lot of text, and in every tavern you can hear some interesting legend or story.

Mission Impossible?

Numerous quests also make you sweat. Come at a certain time, leave your people in a nearby tower, hide near such and such a castle at night with a maximum of three soldiers, walk through the forest in a certain order, listen to conversations in the tavern and draw the right conclusions – almost all tasks are complex, multi-step.

True, this also has a downside. Such complex quests also have complex scripts: if you do something wrong or at the wrong time (for example, if you kill Ursula, the head of one of the factions, ahead of time) – that’s all. Sometimes logic suffers too. According to one of the tasks, you must look for clues in three stages on how to get to the Star Well in order to collect special water there. But if you find it yourself, just wandering around the map, nothing will happen. Or with the same Ursula: you have already sent her on a date with her forefathers, and then they give you a quest to kill her, but say: “Guys, I’ve already done this!"for some reason it’s impossible.

However, everyone can see how difficult it is to build truly complex, non-linear quests – the game comes with an editor with a full set of developer tools.

Yes, even after five years of creation "Legends of Eisenwald" require some modification. And these works are carried out day and night. And yet it’s already clear that the game was a success. We got a beautiful, big and complex adventure, which also makes us think about serious questions.

Pros: fascinating mechanics at the intersection King’s Bounty And Disciples 2; large detailed world; interesting non-linear plot; a lot of moral dilemmas; multi-stage quests.
Cons: there are problems with balance and optimization; sometimes quests freeze; The combat system doesn’t look logical at all.

We find what we strive for, and https://all-slots-casino.uk/bonus/ what we run from catches up with us."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson.
In short, Legend of Grimrock is a dark dungeon filled with deadly traps, assorted monsters and secrets that you still have to try to find.
You find yourself in these dark dungeons for unmentioned sins (another major political showdown?). The airship takes you to the very top of a huge mountain, where there is an abyss leading to these very lands where they dump what they want to forget forever.
This is where the story of our heroes begins. What are they like?? It depends on the player.Everything is like in a classic RPG, you can choose the image of the hero, the class, race and class of the hero, some of his features and distribute points of characteristics and skills. All this allows us to make unique heroes. You can make warriors with an emphasis on defense or attack, ranged fighters, assassins who hide behind their teammates and strike from behind the scenes, as well as magicians with knowledge of spells of various elements.
Of particular interest is finding secrets. There are a lot of them in the game and many are hidden very, very well: you will have to search the walls in search of hidden buttons, solve puzzles and jump into holes to find them, breaking your legs in the process.
Well, now let’s move on to the most interesting part. The most interesting thing about Legend of Grimrock is the gameplay. The gameplay is a good old dungeon crawl: you move around the cells, interact with objects around you by clicking on them with the mouse, and battles by clicking on the character menu, where you place your weapons, magic or items to use. The game also has an inventory from which you can use potions in the heat of battle. Your arsenal includes melee and ranged weapons. For close combat, swords, axes, daggers, and maces are used; for long-range combat, throwing weapons are used, such as stones, shurikens, daggers, throwing axes, and weapons with ammunition, such as bows, crossbows, and dart tubes. Magic is of particular interest – in order to cast any spell you need to open a small menu with symbols from which a special combination is made and the action button is pressed. All this combined represents a rather complex gameplay that forces you to act quickly and think about your further actions.
All this is reinforced by the atmosphere of gloomy corridors and dark dungeon rooms, filled with distant muffled sounds. Descending lower and lower into the depths of the mountain, the dungeon becomes more and more dangerous and gloomy. And it’s unknown what awaits you at the very end.
Verdict: Great game, immersive you into the atmosphere of dark dungeons, which has interesting mechanics and inflames the spirit of the explorer in you.